May I draw my right hon. and learned Friend's attention to early-day motion 1020, which is in my name?
[That this House is alarmed and concerned to learn from the Information Commissioner's report that the blacklisting of trade union members is widespread in the construction industry; condemns the major construction contractors who subscribed to the Consulting Association and also provided it with information about workers and employees; notes that many of the companies who donated to the Consulting Association are currently engaged on publicly-procured work projects worth billions of pounds; considers that there may be legal implications where for example an employee or worker believes they were dismissed because they were on the list and requests that the Information Commissioner gives a reasonable time for people to make the appropriate checks; and calls on the Government to enact immediately legislation to prohibit the compilation of a blacklist containing the details of workers and employees with a view to them being used by employers or employment agencies to discriminate in relation to employment and to make it a criminal offence for an employer to commission such information.]
The early-day motion expresses concern about the fact that the Information Commissioner's report showed that there was blacklisting in the construction industry. Some time ago, we thought that the practice had come to an end. My right hon. and learned Friend will recall that section 3 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 made provision for""regulations prohibiting the compilation of lists","
and made it a criminal offence for construction or other companies to make such information available. Will she raise with Justice Ministers the need to bring forward regulations under section 3, and will she consider whether the Information Commissioner should give people whose names are likely to be on such a list more time to check whether that is so, because of the legal implications? Any person who thinks that they have lost their job as a result of discrimination because their name was on such a list will have a claim for unfair dismissal, so the Information Commissioner should give much more time for people to check the list. Does she also agree—
Business of the House
Business question from
Michael Clapham
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 March 2009.
It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
489 c449-50 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:13:20 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1402855/-question
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1402855/-question
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1402855/-question