UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Wednesday, 4 February 2009, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour) on Wednesday, 4 February 2009.

Question

To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answers by Lord Darzi of Denham on 21 April 2008 (WA 232–36), 12 January 2009 (WA 95–97) and 20 January (WA 196–97), whether consultation of one research paper represents a broad range of available evidence in support of the authority's decision to permit culture of outgrowing human embryos beyond 14 days.

Answer

On the matter of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) assessment of available evidence, in compliance with its statutory functions, I refer the noble Lord to the Answer I gave on 20 January 2009 (WA 197). The HFEA informs me that with regard to Professor Alan Trounson, it has not considered the report of the Australian Senate. The views of Professor Trounson were sought by the HFEA because he is widely considered to be an expert in the field of embryonic stem cells. HFEA members, including co-opted members of HFEA committees, are routinely asked to declare any interests regarding agenda items at the beginning of every committee meeting. The advice and views of all committee members are equally taken into account before the authority makes decisions. This is reflected in the minutes of committee meetings.

Type
Written question
Reference
1058; 707 c126-7WA
Session
2008-09
Embryology
Monday, 12 January 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Tuesday, 20 January 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Monday, 21 April 2008
Written questions
House of Lords
Back to top