UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Thursday, 11 December 2008, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour) on Thursday, 11 December 2008.

Question

To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answers by Lord Darzi of Denham on 29 September (WA 353–54) and 16 October (WA 67), which department or authority should examine the papers referred to in Lord Alton of Liverpool's letter to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) on 6 November 2008; and why the HFEA's statutory remit does not include studying and commenting on evidence that may contradict their conclusions.

Answer

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) had advised me that it considers the broad range of evidence available as part of its statutory duty to keep under review information about embryos and any subsequent development of embryos. However, the HFEA does not consider that this duty obliges it to produce, routinely, commentaries on such information.

Type
Written question
Reference
35; 706 c8WA
Session
2008-09
Embryology
Monday, 12 January 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Monday, 12 January 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Thursday, 16 October 2008
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Monday, 29 September 2008
Written questions
House of Lords
Back to top