UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Thursday, 7 June 2007, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) on Thursday, 7 June 2007.

Question

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether it is their intention, as intimated at Section 16(5) and (6) of the draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill, to permit the possibility of reproductive cloning; and

Answer

The Government are committed to a ban on reproductive cloning, and nothing in the draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill is intended to permit it. Provisions in the draft Bill, however, supersede the Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001, which was introduced to prevent reproductive cloning. In updating the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, the draft Bill now prohibits reproductive cloning so the Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001 is accordingly repealed. The Bill has been published in draft for pre-legislative scrutiny by a parliamentary committee. Clause 16(5) introduces new Section 3ZA into the 1990 Act and defines which eggs and embryos can be placed in a woman. Only permitted eggs and embryos can be used in treatment. This excludes embryos created by reproductive cloning techniques. New Section 3ZA(5) allows for regulations to include, in the category of permitted eggs and/or embryos, those which have had applied to them in prescribed circumstances a prescribed process designed to prevent the transmission of serious mitochondrial disease. Any such regulations would be subject to affirmative resolution in both Houses.

Type
Written question
Reference
3999; 692 c203-4WA
Session
2006-07
Human Tissue and Embryos Bill (Draft)
Tuesday, 19 June 2007
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Wednesday, 3 June 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Back to top