UK Parliament / Open data

Dairy Products

Written question asked by Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat) on Tuesday, 31 October 2006, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 23 October 2006. It was answered by Ben Bradshaw (Labour) on Tuesday, 31 October 2006 on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Question

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment of the level of antibiotics in milk and dairy products his Department has made in each year since 1997; and if he will make a statement.

Answer

Council Directive 96/23/EC requires member states to monitor for the presence of certain substances and residues in food producing animals and animal products. This included antibiotics in milk with effect from January 1998. Commission Decision 97/747/EC stipulated that raw bovine milk should be tested, and sets out other criteria, such as:"the number of milk samples to be collected, based on forecast production;""the proportion of those samples that must be tested for authorised antimicrobial substances, such as antibiotics; and""the proportion tested for substances, including antibiotics that, because of safety concerns, are not allowed to be used in the EU in food-producing animals."The Veterinary Medicines Directorate is the competent authority for the surveillance programme in the UK. Member states are required to send their annual plans for surveillance, containing the above information, to the Commission. Details of the validated analytical methods used in the UK, which in the case of milk screens for a wide range of antibiotics, are also included. The results are also sent to the Commission.The results of the testing of UK cows' milk are given in table 1. This shows since 1997, in a total of some 18,000 analyses for antibiotics, only 5 samples were found to contain residues of antibiotics above the relevant statutory limit. All of these were of authorised veterinary medicines.The VMD carries out additional testing of dairy products, such as cheese and cream, under its non-statutory surveillance scheme. The results are given in table 2. From a total of some 700 analyses since 1997, only one sample of imported cheese contained a detectable residue.The results of this surveillance have been published on the VMD’s Annual Reports on Surveillance from 1998-2000, which can be found at http://www.vmd.gov.uk/publications/annreps/annreps.htm and from 2001 onwards in the annual reports of the independent Veterinary Residues Committee which can be found at http:/www.vet-residues-committee.gov.uk/.

Table 1: Results of surveillance for antibiotic residues in UK cows’ milk
YearAnalyses for antibiotic residuesSamples with detectable residuesSamples at or above the reference point¹
19981,82422
19992,01500
20002,01322
20012,10700
20022,00800
20032,07600
20042,06900
20052,07200
2006²1,81911
Total18,00355
¹ For authorised substances, the reference point is the ‘maximum residue limit’. The EU set this limit, which is the maximum concentration of a residue of a particular veterinary medicine that is legally allowed to be present in or on a food. For unauthorised or banned substances, any residue detected by the UK authorities is reported as ‘positive’.
² To date
Table 2: Results of surveillance for antibiotic residues in other dairy products (UK unless specified)
Product(s)Analyses for antibiotic residuesSamples with detectable residuesSamples at or above the reference point¹
1998
Cheddar Cheese5100
Cream5100
Goat Cheese4000
Sheep Cheese4000
1999
None000
2000
Goats' Milk9200
Organic Cheese(imported)2000
Organic Cheese2000
Organic Cream2400
2001
Goats' Milk10000
2002
None000
2003
Dried Milk Powder10300
2004
None000
2005
Imported Cheese10011
2006
Imported Cheese6600
Total70711
¹ For authorised substances, the reference point is the ‘maximum residue limit’. The EU set this limit, which is the maximum concentration of a residue of a particular veterinary medicine that is legally allowed to be present in or on a food. For unauthorised or banned substances, any residue detected by the UK authorities is reported as ‘positive’.

Type
Written question
Reference
451 c268-70W; 96761
Session
2005-06
Back to top