UK Parliament / Open data

Bovine Tuberculosis

Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Bill Wiggin (Conservative). It was answered on Thursday, 22 June 2006 on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Question

What did the Minister mean when he said ““due course””? When will we find out what he is doing about the consultation? I believe there are 47,000 respondents—he must be reading each response individually. When did the Minister decide to abandon the concept of replacement value for cattle? I have a copy of the June compensation tables. You will be aware, Mr. Speaker, that there is a big difference between a four-year-old cow and one of 14 years old, yet the Government have made no attempt to allow proper compensation for the culling of those poor beasts.

Answer

That is rather a lot of questions. I have nothing further to add to what I said about timing. The hon. Gentleman acknowledged in his question that there had been 47,000 responses to the consultation, which may be a record for any Government consultation. Of course, it is important that the Government take those representations seriously, and that we study the science. On the hon. Gentleman’s point about compensation, he is aware that a number of independent reports have criticised the Government and the Welsh Assembly for seriously over-compensating farmers for TB reactors and that we have a new system based on table valuations, with 47 categories. That was consulted on twice. We are always looking at ways to improve the system but it is already proving extremely effective in addressing the serious issue of over-compensation that occurred previously.

Type
Oral question
Reference
447 c1462 
Session
2005-06
Oral question type
Supplementary
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top